OverviewDailyWeeklyTechniciansTech Overview

Repair Logs

synced 16d ago
17
Logged Rows
17
Unique Items
2
Technicians
5
Labor Hours
from 17 rows (100%)
0
Search Hours
from 0 rows (0%)
$0
Parts Cost
from 0 rows (0%)
Clear 1
StatusQuality Check ×
Day 2026-09-14· 2026-09-14 → 2026-09-14· 17 min avg/job· 9 brands
Day · 2026-09-14 2026-09-14 · pick a bar to change period
←
→
2026-07-18 45 days available 2026-09-16
Useful?
Parts Hold Watchlist 0 jobs waiting on parts
0
Jobs Held
0
Items Held
$0
Parts Value
By Brand
Nothing held.
By Part Needed
Nothing held.
Useful?
Status Funnel where work accumulates
1 Quality Check 100% 17 search
2 Re-estimate 0% 0 search
3 Parts Hold 0% 0 search
4 Incomplete 0% 0 search
5 Complete 0% 0 search
6 Not Repaired 0% 0 search
Useful?
Fault Pareto 8 of 11 faults = 80% of work
1Foam Bad 29.4%
2Grip Loose 41.2%
3Aper Inop 52.9%
4Zoom Stiff 58.8%
5Zoom Loose 64.7%
6No Problem 70.6%
7Focus Squeek 76.5%
8Focus Loose 82.4%
9Aper Sticky 88.2%
10Aper Oily 94.1%
11AF Erratic 100%
Useful?
Who Fixes What 11 single-tech faults · darker = more jobs
Foam BadGrip LooseAper InopZoom StiffZoom LooseNo ProblemFocus SqueekFocus LooseAper StickyAper OilyAF Erratic
TK 5221111111
Zibby 1
Useful?
By Diagnosis what actually broke
1Foam Bad 1 h 5 2Grip Loose 1 h 2 3Aper Inop 1 h 2 4Zoom Stiff 0 h 1 5Zoom Loose 0 h 1 6No Problem 0 h 1 7Focus Squeek 0 h 1 8Focus Loose 0 h 1 9Aper Sticky 0 h 1 10Aper Oily 0 h 1 11AF Erratic 0 h 1
Useful?
By Technician 2 shown
1TK 5 h 16 2Zibby 0 h 1
Useful?
By Status 1 shown
1Quality Check 5 h 17
Useful?
By Brand 9 shown
1Nikon 1 h 4 2Sony 1 h 2 3Sigma 1 h 2 4Pentax 0 h 2 5Hasselblad 1 h 2 6Canon 1 h 2 7Minolta 0 h 1 8Mamiya 0 h 1 9Konica 0 h 1
Useful?
By Repair Code 8 shown
1Foam 1 h 5 2R22 1 h 3 3R20 1 h 3 4R01 0 h 2 5R25 0 h 1 6R02 0 h 1 7GripL 0 h 1 8AI 0 h 1
Useful?
By Discipline 2 shown
1Apprentice 5 h 16 2Digital 0 h 1
Useful?
By Repair Owner 2 shown
1KEH 5 h 16 2Customer 0 h 1
Useful?